Shady Sheik Shady’s lies and taqiyya

The shady Sheik Shady speaks

The shady Sheik Shady speaks

After Orlando and the Ramadan dinner with Malcolm Turnbull, the Shady Sheik was called out for saying nasty things about homosexuals in a video, so he issues a ‘media statement’ so full of crap you could grow tomatoes with it.

The gullible fools over at the Gosford Anglican Facebook page have lapped this up like the obedient little dhimmis they are. But for those of us who have the power of critical thought, let’s settle this once and for all:

With regards to allegations in some media reports today which made reference to statements that I have made in the past, I would like to say the following:

– I unequivocally reject the claim that I called for the stoning or any form of punishment of adulterers and/or homosexuals. As an Australian and a Muslim I unreservedly condemn the vilification and oppression of any group of people based on race, religion, gender, sexuality, or any other criteria for that matter.

This is top rate taqiyya. Islam is all about supremacism and superiority of Muslims over the kuffar – its very purpose is to oppress the non-Muslim world until it submits to the will of Allah. Shady knows this full well, but can’t possibly say it.

The penalty for sodomy is death by stoning, as is clear from the jurisprudence:


012.1 The legal penalty is obligatorily imposed upon anyone who fornicates or commits sodomy when they;

(a) have reached puberty;
(b) are sane;
(c) and commit the act voluntarily;

no matter whether the person is a Muslim, non­ Muslim subject of the Islamic state, or someone who has left Islam.

012.2 If the offender is someone with the capac­ity to remain chaste, then he or she is stoned to death (def: 0]2.6), someone with the capacity to remain chaste meaning anyone who has had sexual intercourse (A; at least once) with their spouse in a valid marriage, and is free, of age, and sane. (Extract from Reliance of the Traveller)

Shady may not have expressly ‘called for’ the stoning of adulterers and/or homosexuals, but in his addresses, he accurately reflects the Islamic law. If he denies this, then he is a heretic.

– Islam’s position on the matter is clear like many other major religions however Islam espouses there is no compulsion in religion and diversity is the norm. As Australians we have and will always show mutual respect for one another.

I think he is saying that Islam’s position on homosexuality is not in dispute – it is a sin and punishable by death by stoning – but that individuals are not obliged to convert to Islam. In a Western country this is true (at least for now), but in Iran and the Islamic State, gays are regularly thrown from buildings (an alternative punishment in the hadith). Whilst homosexual acts may still be regarded as sinful in other religions, Islam is the only one which prescribes death as punishment.

‘No compulsion in religion’ – ah, yes, that old chestnut. As I wrote back in 2014, it is a basic tenet of Islam that Muslims are commanded to proselytise until the whole world is Islamic, and to pretend otherwise is pure falsehood. The three options are convert, die or (if you are ‘lucky’ enough to be a Jew or a Christian) grudgingly permitted to remain in Muslim lands as third class citizens in a state of miserable dhimmitude, a right that could be revoked at any time by their Muslim rulers. And let’s not forget that the punishment for leaving Islam is? Correct. Death.

– In light of the above, there is absolutely no place for homophobia or any sort of hatred or discrimination towards a person who identifies as LGBTI.

That’s all very tolerant and understanding, but it is diametrically opposed to the teaching of Islam, which the Sheik knows very well.

As human beings, we need to come together to overcome and combat the hate that is fuelling so much violence in the world today.

I think I just had a stroke… The hatred is that of Islam for the kuffar…

I believe all Australians, Muslim and non-Muslim, have and will continue to campaign against any form of hatred or discrimination in our society.

And another…

The only time Muslims like Sheik Shady will be happy is when the whole world is Islamic.

Layers of support and concealment mean no ‘lone wolves’ in Islam

Islamic layers of protection [click to enlarge]

Islamic layers of protection [click to enlarge]

The media have used the ‘lone wolf’ tag as an excuse to distract attention away from the ideology of Islam, and on to the individual – he was ‘homophobic’, had ‘mental illness’, family problems – the list goes on.

But the truth is that no Muslim who commits violence is a lone wolf. There is a complex network of support, whether active or passive, behind every terrorist attack, and whether obvious to the casual observer or not.

Every jihadi is protected and concealed by multiple layers, and each layer of the onion must be peeled away to reveal what is at the centre.

Here we list the layers of the support, protection and concealment, from global to local:

  • Firstly, every Muslim is part of the global community of Muslims, the umma, with the shared political ideology of supremacy of Islam, the sharia as the source of law, and the duty to spread the ideology in the infidel lands through violent jihad.
  • Secondly, there’s Islamic State, and its caliph Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi [who we are hoping has been taken out by a US drone strike], which commands Muslims to commit acts of violence against the ‘crusaders’ and the ‘infidels’ (see here for a the Islamic State address on 22 May 2016 – PDF). Documents such as this give comfort and confidence to would-be jihadis, and provide justification for their actions.
  • Thirdly, there are the mosques and prayer groups – the barracks for the soldiers of Allah (© Recep Tayyip Erdogan) – where the Parramatta shooter obtained his weapon, and where massive arms caches have been found in countries all over the world. Masquerading as places of ‘worship’ and claiming all the same privileges as churches or synagogues, the mosques are where the Islamic scholars spread the ideology, and are hence the breeding grounds for extremism and hatred. And there’s a mosque or prayer group in pretty much every suburb.
  • Finally, there are the family and friends, those closest to the jihadi, who see and hear everything, but say and do nothing.

Already the layers are peeling away, as it transpires that the wife of the Orlando shooter, Omar Mateen, knew he was considering an attack and tried to persuade him otherwise.

We already know about the Islamic State, which encouraged attacks against ‘crusaders’ and ‘civilians’ on 22 May this year.

No doubt in time a mosque somewhere will be revealed to have played a role in Mateen’s radicalisation.

And the complicity of the umma in global terrorism is well established – loyalty is always given to the umma above any infidel country or government.

Added to these layers of insulation and concealment, we have yet another: the suicidal Western political correctness which will not even acknowledge the existence of Islamic terrorism, and still maintains Islam is a Religion of Peace™.

If we cannot get through this first layer, we have little hope getting through the remaining four.

%d bloggers like this: